Scientific publications
Radioembolization versus chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
Gardini AC (1), Tamburini E (2), Iñarrairaegui M (3), Frassineti GL (1), Sangro B (3).
(1) Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
(2) Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Infermi, Rimini, Italy.
(3) Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra-IDISNA and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain.
PURPOSE:
This study aimed to compare clinically relevant outcomes following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using only prospective randomized clinical trials as a source of information.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
A meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of TARE and TACE in treating patients with unresectable HCC. Only prospective randomized trials were included in the quantitative analysis. Overall and progression-free survival, disease control rate, and transplantation rate were the variables under analysis.
RESULTS:
Overall survival at 1 year was similar between the two treatment groups (OR =1.31, 95% CI: 0.56-3.04, P=0.53). Progression-free survival at 1 year was also not statistically different between the two treatments (OR =0.23, 95% CI: 0.02-2.45, P=0.22). Although a higher proportion of patients underwent transplantation in the TARE group (30% vs 20.8%), this difference was not statistically significant (OR =0.68, 95% CI: 0.23-2.01; P=0.49).
CONCLUSION:
TARE and TACE provide similar outcomes in unresectable HCC. The role of TARE should be explored in selected patient subpopulations in future clinical trials.
CITATION Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Oct 25;11:7315-7321. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S175715. eCollection 2018
Our authors
