Quantification of corneal neovascularization after ex vivo limbal epithelial stem cell therapy
Guarnieri A (1), Moreno-Montañés J (1), Alfonso-Bartolozzi B (1), Sabater AL (1), García-Guzmán M (2), Andreu EJ (2), Prosper F (2).
(1) Department of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
(2) Department of Cell Therapy, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
View full article
To assess cultured limbal epithelial stem cell transplantation in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency by analyzing and quantifying corneal neovascularization.
This retrospective, interventional case series included eight eyes with total limbal stem cell deficiency. Ex vivo limbal epithelial stem cells were cultured on human amniotic membrane using an animal-free culture method.
The clinical parameters of limbal stem cell deficiency, impression cytology, and quantification of corneal neovascularization were evaluated before and after cultured limbal stem cell transplantation.
The area of corneal neovascularization, vessel caliber (VC), and invasive area (IA) were analyzed before and after stem cell transplantation by image analysis software. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), epithelial transparency, and impression cytology were also measured.
One year after surgery, successful cases showed a reduction (improvement) of all three parameters of corneal neovascularization [neovascular area (NA), VC, IA], while failed cases did not. NA decreased a mean of 32.31% (P=0.035), invasion area 29.37% (P=0.018) and VC 14.29% (P=0.072). BCVA improved in all eyes (mean follow-up, 76±21mo). Epithelial transparency improved significantly from 2.00±0.93 to 0.88±1.25 (P=0.014). Impression cytology showed that three cases failed after limbal epithelial stem cell therapy before 1y of follow-up.
This method of analyzing and monitoring surface vessels is useful for evaluating the epithelial status during follow-up, as successful cases showed a bigger reduction in corneal neovascularization parameters than failed cases. Using this method, successful cases could be differentiated from failed cases.
CITATION Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 18;7(6):988-95. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.06.14. eCollection 2014.