Scientific publications

Durable ventricular assist device in Spain (2007-2020). First report of the REGALAD registry

Aug 30, 2022 | Magazine: Revista Española de Cardiología

Manuel Gómez-Bueno  1 , Enrique Pérez de la Sota  2 , Alberto Forteza Gil  3 , Daniel Ortiz-Berbel  4 , Javier Castrodeza  5 , María Dolores García-Cosío Carmena  6 , Eduardo Barge-Caballero  7 , Diego Rangel Sousa  8 , Beatriz Díaz Molina  9 , Rebeca Manrique Antón  10 , Luis Almenar-Bonet  11 , Aitor Uribarri González  12 , Alfredo Barrio-Rodríguez  13 , María Ángeles Castel Lavilla  14 , Laura López-López  15 , David Dobarro Pérez  16 , Francisco Pastor Pérez  17 , Virginia Burgos-Palacios  18 , Jesús Álvarez-García  19 , José Manuel Garrido-Jiménez  20 , Óscar González-Fernández  21 , Pau Codina  22 , Amador López-Granados  23 , Andrés Grau-Sepulveda  24 , José González-Costello  25


Introduction and objectives
This report presents the clinical characteristics, outcomes and complications of all consecutive patients implanted with a long-term mechanical circulatory support device in Spain between 2007 and 2020.

Methods
Analysis of the Spanish registry of durable ventricular assist devices (REGALAD) including data form Spanish centers with a mechanical circulatory support program.

Results
During the study period, 263 ventricular assist devices were implanted in 22 hospitals. The implanted device was an isolated continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in 182 patients (69%), a pulsatile-flow device (58 isolated left ventricular and 21 biventricular) in 79 (30%), and a total artificial heart in 2 patients (1%). The strategy of the implant was as bridge to heart transplant in 78 patients (30%), bridge to candidacy in 110 (42%), bridge to recovery in 3 (1%) and destination therapy in 72 patients (27%). Overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 79%, 74% and 69%, respectively, and was better in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (84%, 80%, and 75%). The main adverse events related to this therapy were infections (37% of patients), bleeding (35%), neurological (29%), and device malfunction (17%).

Conclusions
Durable ventricular assist devices have emerged in Spain in the last few years as a useful therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. As in other international registries, the current trend is to use continuous-flow intracorporeal left ventricular devices, which are associated with better results. Adverse events continue to be frequent and severe.

CITATION  Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022 Aug 30;S1885-5857(22)00213-4.  doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.07.011