Scientific publications

Assessment of the value of confirming responses in clinical trials in oncology

Pérez-Gracia J.L. (a), Muñoz M. (b), Williams G. (c), Wu J. (d), Carrasco E. (b), García-Ribas I. (b), Peiro A. (b), López-Picazo J.M. (a), Gúrpide A. (a), Chopitea A. (a), Martín-Algarra S. (a), García-Foncillas J. (a), Blatter J. (e)
(a) Medical Oncology Department, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Avenida de Pío XII 36, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
(b) Clinical Research Department, Eli Lilly and Company, Madrid, Spain.
(c) US Food and rug Administration, USA.
(d) Clinical Research Department, Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, USA.
(e) Clinical Research Department, Eli Lilly and Company, Frankfort, Germany.

Magazine: European Journal of Cancer

Date: Jul 1, 2005

Medical Oncology

The requirement for a second assessment to confirm initial tumour response is required by all response guidelines. Its rationale, however, is not clear. We have conducted this study to compare validity of response rate assessment determined with and without secondary confirmation.

Using specified criteria, nine trials of one single cytotoxic drug including 416 patients were selected from a pharmaceutical database. Objective response rates were determined by a single determination and by two separate determinations. 81 responses (19.5%, [15.8-23.6%]) were scored by the confirmation method and 97 responses (23.3% [19.3-27.7%]) by the no-confirmation method. The Kappa (kappa) coefficient of 0.89 indicates good agreement between both methods. This is the first study that systematically compares response rates calculated with and without performing response confirmation. Results show good agreement between both methods.

We suggest that assessing response without confirmation may be the preferred method. These results should be confirmed by additional studies in a variety of cancer settings.

CITATION  Eur J Cancer. 2005 Jul;41(11):1528-32



The Clínica is the greater private hospital with technological equipment of Spain, all in a single center.

Imagen de un PET, tecnología de vanguardia en la Clínica Universidad de Navarra


The professionals of the Clínica perform continuous research and training, always to the benefit of the patient.

Imagen profesionales de la Clínica Universidad de Navarra


Learn why we are different from other healthcare centers. Quality, speed, comfort and results.

Imagen del edificio de la Clínica Universidad de Navarra