Assessment of the methodological and ethical quality of clinical trials published in family medicine journals
Castaño-García A (1), Guillén-Grima F (2), León-Sanz P (3).
(1) Centro de Salud de Corella, Servicio Navarro de Salud, Corella, Navarra.
(2) Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Navarra.
(3) Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Humanidades Biomédicas, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, España.
Magazine: Gaceta Médica de México
Date: May 15, 2018Preventive Medicine [SP]
Objective: To evaluate some methodological and ethical quality variables of clinical trials (CTs) published in 10 family medicine journals.
Methods: Quality descriptive study of 10 family medicine journals including CTs in humans published since 2010 to 2013. We obtained 141 CT and 2447 were excluded.
Results: CTs parallels controlled in 92.9% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 92.0-93.9). Masked randomization in 72.3% (95% CI: 71.7-73.1), decentralized in 51.8% (95% CI: 51.4-52.4) and using as control an active treatment in 82.2% (95% CI: 81.5-83.1).
Wrote informed consent in 48.9% (95% CI: 48.5-49.5) and it was not withdrawn in 56.0% of cases (95% CI: 55.5-56.7). Approval by clinical research ethics committee (CREC) in 134, and there was no conflict of interest in 117 CTs. Average κ was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99).
Conclusions: We observe an increase in some quality variables like masked randomization (19.6%) and approval by CREC (75%) post CONSORT, in CTs published in 10 family medicine journals (2010-2013).
CITATION Gac Med Mex. 2018;154(1):92-104. doi: 10.24875/GMM.17002699
you maybe interested
The Clínica is the greater private hospital with technological equipment of Spain, all in a single center.
The professionals of the Clínica perform continuous research and training, always to the benefit of the patient.
Learn why we are different from other healthcare centers. Quality, speed, comfort and results.