- [CIRUGÍA CARDÍACA]
- [MEDICINA PREVENTIVA]
- [MICROBIOLOGÍA CLÍNICA]
Standard versus extended primary cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation
María Serrano-Alonso 1 , Paloma Martín-Moreno 2 , Gregorio Rábago 3 , Francisco Guillén-Grima 4 , José I Herrero 5 , Mirian Fernández-Alonso 6
Background and objective: We compared the efficacy and safety of standard vs. extended primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation.
Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort study of CMV seronegative recipients who received CMV prophylaxis after solid organ transplantation from seropositive donor (D+/R-) (2007-2017). CMV infection in the first two years after transplantation in recipients with prophylaxis longer or shorter than 100 days were compared.
Results: CMV infection occurred in 29 of 66 patients (43.9%) with prophylaxis. Forty-five patients (68.2%) received extended prophylaxis. CMV infection and disease rates were not different between patients with extended and standard prophylaxis. However, extended prophylaxis was associated with a higher rate of myelotoxicity (68.9% vs. 42.9%, p<0.05).
Conclusions: Extending primary CMV prophylaxis over 100 days did not prevent late-onset infection but it was associated with hematological toxicity.
CITA DEL ARTÍCULO Med Clin (Barc). 2021 Aug 2;S0025-7753(21)00397-3. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2021.05.023