PUBLICAÇÕES científicas

Effectiveness of subunit influenza vaccination in the 2014-2015 season and residual effect of split vaccination in previous seasons

Castilla J (1), Navascués A (2), Fernández-Alonso M [ES] (3), Reina G [ES] (3), Pozo F (4), Casado I (5), Guevara M (5), Martínez-Baz I (5), Barricarte A (5), Ezpeleta C (2); Primary Health Care Sentinel Network; Network for Influenza Surveillance in Hospitals of Navarra.
(1) Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra, IdiSNA-Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain.
(2) Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, IdiSNA-Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain.
(3) Clínica Universidad de Navarra, IdiSNA-Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain.
(4) Centro Nacional de Microbiología (WHO National Influenza Centre-Madrid), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Spain.
(5) Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra, IdiSNA-Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain.

Revisão:Vaccine

Data: 5/Fev/2016

Microbiologia Clínica [ES]

BACKGROUND

In Navarra, Spain, subunit vaccine was first used in the 2014-2015 season, whereas trivalent split-virion influenza vaccines had been used in previous seasons. We estimate the effectiveness of the subunit vaccine in the current season and split vaccine in the two previous seasons against laboratory-confirmed influenza in the 2014-2015 season.

METHODS

Patients with influenza-like illness hospitalized or attended by sentinel general practitioners were swabbed for influenza testing. The previous and current vaccine status of laboratory-confirmed cases was compared to test-negative controls.

RESULTS

Among 1213 patients tested, 619 (51%) were confirmed for influenza virus: 52% influenza A(H3N2), 46% influenza B, and 2% A(H1N1)pdm09. The overall effectiveness for subunit vaccination in the current season was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -13 to 42), 2% (95%CI: -47 to 35) against influenza A(H3N2) and 32% (95%CI: -4 to 56) against influenza B.

The effectiveness against any influenza was 67% (95%CI: 17-87) for 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 vaccination only, 42% (95%CI: -31 to 74) for 2014-2015 vaccination only, and 38% (95%CI: 8-58) for vaccination in the 2012-2013, 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 seasons. The same estimates against influenza A(H3N2) were 47% (95%CI: -60 to 82), -54% (95%CI: -274 to 37) and 28% (95%CI: -17 to 56), and against influenza B were 82% (95%CI: 19-96), 93% (95%CI: 45-99) and 43% (95%CI: 5-66), respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest a considerable residual protection of split vaccination in previous seasons, low overall effectiveness of current season subunit vaccination, and possible interference between current subunit and previous split vaccines.

CITAÇÃO DO ARTIGO  Vaccine. 2016 Feb 5. pii: S0264-410X(16)00117-1. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.054.

talvezlhe interesse

QUE TECNOLOGIA UTILIZAMOS? 

A Clínica é o hospital privado com maiores recursos tecnológicos de Espanha, tudo num único centro.

Imagen de un PET, tecnología de vanguardia en la Clínica Universidad de Navarra

OS NOSSOS
PROFISSIONAIS

Os profissionais da Clínica realizam um trabalho contínuo de investigação e formação, sempre em benefício do paciente.

Imagen profesionales de la Clínica Universidad de Navarra

RAZÕES PARA VIR
À CLÍNICA

Conheça porque é que somos diferentes em relação a outros centros sanitários. Qualidade, rapidez, comodidade e resultados.

Imagen del edificio de la Clínica Universidad de Navarra