Publicaciones científicas

Carfilzomib and pomalidomide in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma with baseline risk factors

Dimopoulos MA (1), Sonneveld P (2), Siegel D (3), Palumbo A (4), San-Miguel J (5).
(1) Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
(2) Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
(3) John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, USA.
(4) Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
(5) Centre of Applied Medical Research, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain. 

Revista: Annals of Oncology

Fecha: 27-jul-2015

Hematología y Hemoterapia

RESUMEN

While survival times have increased over the last decade, most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) eventually relapse and become refractory to therapy.

The treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM is frequently further complicated by the presence of pre-existing comorbidities that arise from an advanced disease state and of toxicities stemming from prior antimyeloma treatment.

Carfilzomib and pomalidomide have recently been approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory MM. While these agents represent important additions to the available treatment options, the identification of patients who may best benefit from the use of each of therapy is still being investigated.

A number of patient-related and disease-related factors may impact treatment efficacy and/or tolerability, and the clinical presentation and medical history of each patient must be carefully considered to optimize treatment.

Here, we review results from carfilzomib and pomalidomide clinical trials in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM who also have baseline comorbidities or treatment-induced or disease-induced complications (including the presence of renal impairment, cardiac risk factors, peripheral neuropathy, or high-risk chromosomal abnormalities) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the two agents in these difficult-to-treat patients and to provide treatment recommendations specific to each scenario. 

CITA DEL ARTÍCULO  Ann Oncol. 2015 Nov;26(11):2247-56. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv325. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

tal vezLE INTERESE

¿QUÉ TECNOLOGÍA UTILIZAMOS?

La Clínica es el hospital privado con mayor dotación tecnológica de España, todo en un único centro.

Imagen de un PET, tecnología de vanguardia en la Clínica Universidad de Navarra

NUESTROS
PROFESIONALES

Los profesionales de la Clínica realizan una labor continuada de investigación y formación, siempre en beneficio del paciente.

Imagen profesionales de la Clínica Universidad de Navarra

POR QUÉ VENIR
A LA CLÍNICA

Conozca por qué somos diferentes a otros centros sanitarios. Calidad, rapidez, comodidad y resultados.

Imagen del edificio de la Clínica Universidad de Navarra