Publicaciones científicas

Long-term follow-up of late onset vestibular complaints in patients with cochlear implant

González-Navarro M (1), Manrique-Huarte R (2), Manrique-Rodríguez M (2), Huarte-Irujo A (2), Pérez-Fernández N (2).
(1) Subdivision of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion , Distrito Federal, Mexico.
(2) Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra , Pamplona, Spain. 

Revista: Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Fecha: 01/12/2015

Otorrinolaringología

CONCLUSION

Patients with cochlear implants should be treated no differently than non-implanted patients with similar symptomatology.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the spectrum of symptomatology, treatment, and long-term follow-up of patients with cochlear implant and vestibular complaints.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 25 patients with late onset vestibular complaints (more than 1 month post-implantation). Each patient underwent an extensive interrogatory and physical exam with ancillary test to complete a diagnosis. Treatment was given according to this and all patients followed a vestibular rehabilitation program.

RESULTS

The total population was 72% male and 28% female, median age was 58 years; minimal follow-up was 9 months (mean = 51, median = 34).

Cochleostomy was performed in eight cases and round window insertion was performed in 19 (two patients were removed from each group in the analysis due to their bilateral implantation under a different approach).

The mean time from implant to vestibular symptoms was 53 months, median = 32; a Kaplan Meier graphic showed the round window approach has faster onset of symptoms with statistical significance (p = 0.020). The most common complaint was instability in all patients and after both surgical approaches. No difference in symptoms was found with a Kruskall Wallis test except for vertigo spells (more common in the round window approach). In 12 patients the symptomatology was attributed to the implanted side.

In the long-term follow-up a relatively high number of patients (20/25) recovered with standard treatment, suggesting the presence of the implant is not associated with poor recovery prognosis.

CITA DEL ARTÍCULO  Acta Otolaryngol. 2015 Dec;135(12):1245-52. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2015.1072874. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

tal vezLE INTERESE

¿QUÉ TECNOLOGÍA UTILIZAMOS?

La Clínica es el hospital privado con mayor dotación tecnológica de España, todo en un único centro.

Imagen de un PET, tecnología de vanguardia en la Clínica Universidad de Navarra

NUESTROS
PROFESIONALES

Los profesionales de la Clínica realizan una labor continuada de investigación y formación, siempre en beneficio del paciente.

Imagen profesionales de la Clínica Universidad de Navarra

POR QUÉ VENIR
A LA CLÍNICA

Conozca por qué somos diferentes a otros centros sanitarios. Calidad, rapidez, comodidad y resultados.

Imagen del edificio de la Clínica Universidad de Navarra